Medical Marijuana Patients
Often Abandoned by Doctors
by Ed Glick, RN
MEDICAL ESTABLISHMENT ABANDONS PATIENTS AND ETHICS:
IS THERE A DOCTOR ( OR NURSE ) IN THE HOUSE?
Nursing is Caring
Twenty years ago I began to learn what real suffering looks and feels like. I watched helplessly while beautiful young men would, in three months time, age 50 years, dying from a disease no one knew anything about at the time.
I have watched tobacco-cancer eat the lungs, livers and hearts out of people. They had no idea, when they began using this legal herb, the consequences in store for them.
I've cared for all of these people because they were suffering, and because I am a nurse.
Today I sadly witness another widespread - and preventable - tragedy of human suffering. It is the pain of ill and dying people, legally persecuted for using an illegal herb, and simultaneously denied their appropriate medicine by the medical establishment. This is the everyday experience of cannabis patients, the "untouchables" of American medicine.
I've listened countless times as patients beg me to give them something I can't - permission to use, grow, smoke, eat, and possess one simple herb. They ask me to tell a narcotics "task-force" that they couldn't find their registry card, or explain to a doctor that the drug keeps them from vomiting up their protease inhibitors.
I've been watching this nightmare unfold in slow motion, while the medical system that I thought supported patients consigns them to unnecessary suffering and death.
My nursing education, which taught me all about mitering the corners of bed sheets and the anatomy of disease, never prepared me for this.
Nursing school taught that the essence of nursing is compassion. Yet today, I watch as Oregon's nursing and physician leaders cause pain and suffering to the very people they are ethically committed to care for. Who forbids a dying cancer patient a safe and natural herb that mitigates some of the worst symptoms of their disease? What kind of society allows legalisms to envelop and destroy an entire class of people, namely cannabis patients? What can I say to these patients, other than "I'm sorry".
Oregonians To Medical Establishment: "Take Care Of 'Em"
Scientific, historical, and experiential research has described numerous clinical indications for cannabis. The biochemical mechanisms underlying its efficacy are only now being uncovered. Although its primary medical indication is for pain, it is also indicated as an anti-emetic ( anti-nausea ), anti-spasmotic, intraocular ( eye ) pressure reducer, anti-anxiety agent, and appetite stimulant - among others. For many sick and suffering people, Cannabis is a good medicine.
On November 3rd 1998, voters approved Ballot Measure 67, The Oregon Medical Marijuana Act, 54% to 45%. Voters' intention was clear: cannabis patients belong in the medical, not the criminal justice system.
The Oregon Medical Marijuana Act represented a watershed event in Oregon, and nationally, by exempting patients from state criminal sanctions for using cannabis, and by mandating the Department of Human Services ( DHS ), Health Services ( formerly the Oregon Health Division ) to establish a registration system on their behalf.
Upon passage, and with such unequivocal voter mandate, the legal protection envisioned by OMMA'S framer's was finally realized. We thought.
First results were encouraging. Through 1999 and 2000 the Medical Marijuana Program grew rapidly under the leadership of Ms. Kelly Paige, an employee of the Department. By May of 2001 it had grown to include 2800 registrants, with some 550 physicians having registered one or more patients in the Program. This remarkable number represents the highest physician compliance rate in the US. It also reflects the large number of patients in Oregon who use cannabis. And, in the three years that the Medical Marijuana Program has existed, it has afforded some substantial protection to thousands of Oregonians from unwanted contact with police.
But all is not well in this system. Structural flaws and interpretations have left thousands more vulnerable to legal harassment. And, unfortunately, even registrants in the Medical Marijuana Program face frequent police searches because of inadequate possession limits and confusion in the law. At the end of the day, thousands of ill Oregonians still suffer from double exclusion ( from both the Medical Marijuana Program, and the medical system ), and double inclusion ( into the legal and criminal system ). This is not what Oregonian voters voted for.
The passage of the OMMA should have ended forever the abuse of cannabis patients at the hands of police and District Attorneys. Unfortunately, it didn't. In the intervening years, multiple unforseen problems have developed. These include 1. Patient inability to pay the application fee; 2. Inadequate cannabis possession limits; 3. Uncooperative physicians, 4. Obstruction of physicians by the Board of Medical Examiners, and 5. The Oregon DHS's prohibitive new Administrative Rules. Each of these hurdles effectively pushes patients back into the waiting arms of police and the criminal justice system.
Prohibitive program registration fees have prevented many patients from accessing the program. Chronically ill patients, bankrupted by America's for-profit medical system, are forced to choose between sending $150 to the Medical Marijuana Program, or paying rent. Some patients resort to selling pharmaceuticals on the black market to raise the funds. As one patient stated at recent Administrative Rules hearings: [The] "Oregon Health Divisions Medical Marijuana Program is a Mafia Protection Racket."
Yet the Department is currently taking in excess of $350,000 per year in patient money. This income should have allowed for a reduction in the registry fee. It didn't.
Instead of a reduction in the registry fee, vast sums of patient moneys are being spent by the bureaucrats of the Medical Marijuana Program on Attorney General consultations, and Administrative Rules revisions. These activities have prevented timely processing of applications. Legally, the OMMA requires processing of applications within 30 days. The Department is chronically out of compliance. This great waste of energy has come at the expense - physically, and financially - of the patients whose wellbeing the program is supposed to support.
Impossible plant and medicine possession limits also obstruct patients. The OMMA allows only seven plants, up to three of which can be mature at any time. "Usable" cannabis amounts are tied to the number of flowering plants. Patients are often unable to maintain compliance with these small allowances. If they harvest one plant then the allowable possession limit of cannabis is reduced by one ounce! If they harvest all plants together, or make cuttings, they exceed the limit again. If they grow their seven plants outside, a sensible approach, they end up with seven large flowering plants, and a pound or more of medicine. Most often the problem is simply an inability to grow a quantity of medicine sufficient to meet the patient's medical needs.
Unfortunately, Administrative Rules don't address these issues.
Doctors To Patients: "Don't Bug Me"
An even greater obstacle to patients became apparent in 1999, as large numbers of physicians quietly decided not to participate in the Registry Program. This left chronically ill people all over Oregon searching for a physician who'd sign their form, allowing entry into the Medical Marijuana Program.
Often, the doctor will privately admit to the patient that cannabis appears to be an effective treatment. Still, many physicians refuse to sign the form, citing fear of Drug Enforcement Administration ( DEA ), or disagreement with cannabis therapy on ideological or medical grounds.
DEA fear is not entirely unjustified. US Attorney General John Ashcroft has shown his disregard for patient suffering by actively arresting physicians and patients, and closing Cannabis Resource Centers in California. There is a possibility that the Attorney General may attack physicians in Oregon, though this has yet to happen. ( Amazingly, the Attorney General is fighting Oregon patients on two opposing fronts. He simultaneously opposes terminally ill patients who wish to use drugs to die, and severely ill patients who wish to use drugs to live. )
Unfortunately physician non-participation inevitably pushes the problem back on the patient. This constitutes gross patient abandonment. By protecting themselves from the slight possibility of legal involvement, physicians place their patients directly in the crosshairs of the criminal justice system. Patients are easy prey to well-financed and trained narcotics task-force paramilitaries. In 2001, cannabis patients in Oregon endured numerous knock-and-talk searches and full-blown raids, including the indignity of forced urine collections while handcuffed. In 2002, cannabis patients are arrested and prosecuted because they lack legal and medical protection.
Oregon's medical establishment has either ignored or exacerbated the problem. The Board of Medical Examiners has initiated a witch-hunt against one physician with the aim of removing his license to practice medicine in Oregon. The Department of Human Services has introduced new rules resulting in a decrease of the numbers of patients who can apply to the medical marijuana program.
Nursing organizations in Oregon have followed in the doctors' wake, much as women ( once ) followed men: with silence and acquiescence. Neither the Oregon Nurses Association nor the Oregon State Board of Nursing has addressed the many problems cannabis patients and their nurses face in Oregon. Through simple non-participation, nurses have mostly removed themselves from an issue of great importance to thousands of Oregonians.
Government And Medical Board To Doctor Leveque: "Oh No You Don't!"
Into this vacuum of medical conscience stepped one physician: Doctor Philip Leveque, a retired Osteopath from OHSU. Through 2000 and 2001, doctor Leveque signed 800 Medical Marijuana Program applications. His effort allowed virtually any patient suffering from a legally qualifying "Debilitating Medical Condition" to access the safety net of the Medical Marijuana Program. Through these actions, Doctor Leveque prevented a public health emergency by simultaneously integrating large numbers of patients into the medical system, and removing them from the illegal drug underground.
Doctor Leveque was so successful, in fact, that in 2001 both the Oregon DHS and the Board of Medical Examiners undertook investigations of him which continue to this day. Citing concerns about documentation, the validity of the "attending physician relationship", his "failing to uphold minimum standards of practice", and now his psychological stability, they are attempting to undo his good work and remove his license to practice. This sends a signal to other physicians to not get involved in OMMA.
These actions are a clear example of a medical system that has distanced itself from the needs of patients, even as it proclaims support for them.
The Medical Marijuana Program wasn't always this dysfunc-tional. When Kelly Paige managed it there were big problems, including chronic understaffing, but patient dissatisfaction was not one of them. Ms. Paige was, from the beginning, a serious patient advocate who designed, organized, implemented and operated the program almost single-handedly. She worked hard to educate physicians and register patients. Ms. Paige was so successful that Oregon's Medical Marijuana Program became the model program for other States with similar laws. She helped implement programs in Hawaii, Maine and Colorado. Unfortunately, Oregon's registry program was slowly swamped by lack of administrative support and continual rapid growth.
In May of 2001, Willamette Week prepared a story describing a few cases in which patients forged Dr. Leveque's signature on application forms. In a colossal overreaction to the story, Department of Human Services Director Bob Mink abruptly ordered Ms. Paige's reassignment. By stating: "I expect more of my programs and managers", he in effect killed the messenger and ignored the message. The one person who knew the program inside and out was made responsible for problems she had identified, repeatedly communicated and in some cases solved. Citing serious abuses of the program and poor managerial oversight, new program staff were hired and asked to simultaneously learn the program, operate it and rewrite the Administrative Rules. From May, 2002 onwards, the Medical Marijuana Program floundered with inexperienced staff, large backlogs of unprocessed applications and spiraling patient dissatisfaction that continues to this day.
New, "Improved" & User-Unfriendly
The culmination of the new staff's efforts was a set of provisional rules released in November, allowing the Department of Human Services to obtain and review any patient's medical records to establish a "bona-fide" physician/patient relationship. They also "clarified" the definition of "attending physician" to exclude Dr. Leveque, ( or any other physician ) from "rubberstamping" patient applications. Additionally, the Department applied the rules retroactively, requiring all of Dr. Leveque's patients to submit all their medical records for review and/or resubmit another application. Failure to do so would disqualify them from the program. This action in particular caused a collective anxiety attack amongst hundreds of patients who had already gone to great personal effort to comply with the law. Many subsequently gave up.
The Department of Human Services has continued to narrowly interpret the OMMA, to the detriment of patients. In February 2002, Program Managers announced that "designated primary caregivers" may only deliver cannabis to a patient registered to that caregiver. This has the potential to destroy the many advocacy and support organizations that assist patients by sharing medicine with those who have no access.
Legal challenges to this "interpretation" are likely. Unfortunately, police agencies will use this as an opportunity to intensify searches and arrest patients and caregivers. The Department of Human Services bears direct responsibility for the unnecessary suffering of patients and caregivers caught in this legal crossfire.
Cannabis Patients To Medical Establishment: "Get Used To Us."
Today, there are many thousands of ill Oregonians using cannabis to relieve their symptoms. They use it because cannabis affects "root" physiology of pain, suffering and anxiety. Doctors and nurses know this to be true.
But most cannabis patients in Oregon use cannabis outside of the Medical Marijuana Program, and will continue to do so. Why? For starters, the misfortunes of many of the program's registrants are not lost on the many disabled, but unregistered, people in this state. These folks have a legitimate interest in registering for the program but, given current conditions, would rather take their chances with the local cops.
Sadly, the current situation pulls patients in two opposite directions: one of promised ( but unobtainable ) legal protection under the OMMA law; the other of quiet disobedience. Either way, people will continue to use cannabis as a proven effective medicine - and be arrested for it.
Patients in Oregon will receive the medicine they need and cease being the targets of police harassment only when they are fully integrated into the medical system. Until then, cannabis patients will continue to be uniquely vulnerable. Their suffering is needlessly prolonged and exacerbated by the Federal Government's War on Drugs ( WOD ) combined with physician and medical system abandonment. We may not be able to do much about the WOD, but we can influence physicians and the medical establishment of Oregon by holding them to the highest medical ethics.
The Health Services's Mission Statement says it exists "To protect, preserve and promote the health of all the people of Oregon. To prevent unnecessary death and disability, improve the health status, and reduce the per-capita cost of illness care for all Oregonians." The ethics of medicine and nursing describe a philosophy of compassion that is at the "root" of medical practice. Caring for others is a fundamental quality of civilized society.
Oregon voters clearly expressed themselves in November 1998. Their wishes have only partly materialized.
Edward Glick, RN has been practicing nursing since 1983 in a variety of clinical settings including AIDS, medical, cardiac, ayurvedic, and currently, psychiatric at Good Samaritan Hospital in Corvallis, Oregon. He participated in writing and campaigning for The Oregon Medical Marijuana Act, ( 1998 ) and is a member of the DHS's Debilitating Medical Conditions Advisory Panel ( 2000 ).
Ed is founder of "Contigo-Conmigo", an Oregon educational non-profit corporation ( 1999 ), and a co-Chief Petitioner on OMMA-2.
Ed Glick is author of The Oregon Medical Marijuana Guide- A Resource for Patients and Health Care Providers, ( 2001 ). Ed can be reached at gina@proaxis.com
Experts Urge Responsible
Cannabis Regulation
Blueprints For Reform Offered
"Cannabis Congress" Cites Dutch, California Models
As Promising Examples For Global Reform
Prominent drug policy experts and public health officials today urged governments around the world to regulate cannabis responsibly and to ensure safe, reliable access to patients who need it. At the symposium, "Regulating Cannabis Options for Control in the 21st Century," leading scholars and public officials assembled at Regent's College in London to develop blueprints for the regulation of cannabis. The conference was being referred to by many as the "First International Cannabis Congress" because of its groundbreaking topic and worldwide policy implications.
"As decriminalisation becomes more of a reality in several countries, this conference has offered policy makers several feasible and responsible options for cannabis regulation," said Mike Goodman, director of Release, a UK-based drug policy organisation which co-hosted the conference.
"Public opinion in favor of cannabis decriminalisation continues to grow worldwide," said Ethan Nadelmann, director of The Lindesmith Center, a US-based drug policy research institute which is also co-hosting the conference. "As policy makers are forced to take up the challenge of cannabis regulation, they can evaluate the models of regulation discussed at this conference to determine the most responsible policies."
Several recent events have prompted the need for the "Cannabis Congress." Most recently, in order to allow patients access to therapeutic cannabis and to protect their suppliers from federal prosecution, the City Council of Oakland, California passed an ordinance designating cannabis buyer's clubs "officers" of the city. Prior to the city of Oakland's decision, the Canadian Government had said it will approve medicinal use of cannabis on a case-by-case basis. A summary of other happenings around the world is attached.
The cannabis conference is being hosted by Release, a UK drugs and legal advice charity, and The Lindesmith Center, a New York-based drug policy research institute. The day-long conference will be held at 915 a.m. on Saturday, 5 September at Regent's College in London.
Founded in 1967, Release established the world's first ever 24-hour drugs and legal advice helpline. The organisation's range of innovative services, pioneering work with young people as well as its commitment to the civil rights of drug users has contributed to its unique credibility in the drugs and legal advice field.
Based in New York, the Lindesmith Center is a drug policy research institute that concentrates on broadening the drug policy debate. The Lindesmith Center is a project of the George Soros, the Open Society Institute promotes the development of open societies around the world through projects relating to education, media, legal reform and human rights. The founder and director of The Lindesmith Center is Ethan Nadelmann, J.D., Ph.D. , author of Cops Across Borders: The Internationalization of U.S. Criminal Law Enforcement (Penn State Press, 1993) as well as numerous articles on drug control policy in leading scholarly and popular journals.
Using a Proven Approach;
Applying Harm Reduction
to Medical Marijuana
By Edward Glick, RN
The political winds in the "War on Drugs" are shifting, not just in the U.S., but throughout the world. Because of the glaring failure of drug control strategies, alternative approaches, that were previously rejected or ignored, are gaining attention. One approach, "harm-reduction," seeks first to prevent harmful behaviors, and then, recognizing the reality that some people do not always make life-enhancing decisions, seeks to minimize the negative effects to both the person and to society.
This harm reduction strategy, applied to the use of drugs, is exemplified by approaches in Switzerland and Holland where all drugs are classified according to harmful effects. The Dutch, who have created separate categories for "hard drugs" (like heroin) and "soft drugs" (like marijuana), have had success in separating the people who use marijuana and hashish from those who use cocaine and heroin, thereby drawing boundaries around both. The laws have not been changed, none of these substances are legal, but enforcement has been modified based on this change in perception.
This strategy has shifted valuable law enforcement and public health resources into dealing with the most dangerous drugs. Such attempts to prioritize drugs and related behaviors on a continuum of risk versus benefit-an application of harm reduction strategy-conflicts with the assumptions on which drug policies of many other countries are currently based. This is especially true in the U.S. which emphasizes punitive legal sanctions.
One of the main tenets of harm reductions is a de-emphasis on the attempt to control behavior through laws. Applied to the issue of drug-abuse (alcohol, tobacco, prescription and illegal drugs) it would seek to prevent or minimize use through education and then, in response to misuse, minimize the harm by providing assistance based upon a medical framework. Addiction is viewed as a medical problem and dealt with accordingly. When drug prevention does not succeed, appropriate information and support is provided. Needle exchange programs for those afflicted with heroin addiction is an example.
Harm reduction is already widely practiced, to good effect, in areas other than drug use. Until recently, mentally ill persons were routinely prosecuted and incarcerated for antisocial behaviors. Now, as mental illness is better understood as biochemical mix-ups in the brain, police officers are more likely escort people, exhibiting symptoms of mental illness, to the hospital. Society benefits from the more effective use of its resources and the suffering are more likely to receive appropriate and just treatment.
Unfortunately, this same reliance on prevention and treatment does not extend to users of illegal drugs. There is little understanding or tolerance for those afflicted with heroin or cocaine addiction. However, the strictly punitive approach of the war on illegal drugs is being challenged. Health professionals all over Europe and America are beginning to recognize that drug use is, by its nature a health care issue, not a law enforcement one. As, in other areas of public health, there is a growing comprehension that prevention and timely support will save money, mitigate suffering and be more effective in the long run.
In November of 1997 voters in Switzerland overwhelmingly confirmed this harm reduction approach by approving expansion of heroin maintenance programs. The harms to society associated with providing heroin to understanding of physiology, that is, how these chemicals are metabolized, distributed and eliminated from the body. This is, in turn, related to the reason for using marijuana-recreationally or medically and even the specific medical use-which will suggest the best method of consumption to minimize potentially harmful effects, while effectively deriving the desired benefits.
Eating Marijuana
(Link NOTE: If the patient wishes to avoid smoking and is able to obtain the medicinal benefits of cannabis by oral ingestion, then please refer to the "COOK BOOK" section of this website for some very good preparation recipes.) Orally ingesting (eating) marijuana carries with it unique and poorly understood effects. The maximum blood level (and corresponding pharmacological effect) occurs from 1 to 3 hours after ingestion. This lapse in time is no problem for someone eating marijuana brownies for fun but may be a problem for nauseated patients. Therefore, persons actively vomiting should avoid the oral route. The slower onset of effects is due to slower absorption and digestion in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. When eating marijuana it is also more difficult to regulate the desired dosage. The bio-availability of THC, the percentage actually delivered to the bloodstream in usable form, through the oral route is also very low-5%-20%. The other 80%-90% is absorbed by the stomach and metabolized by the liver. This is why users who eat marijuana require a much larger total dosage.
Not much is known about the chemical breakdown of THC into new compounds, or metabolites, but the major one, "11-hydroxy-THC," many exceed the blood level of THC after eating marijuana. As a distinct chemical compound, it is likely that 11-hydroxy-THC may moderate, enhance or contribute to specific pharmacological effects. This is one reason why medical users should carefully monitor the effects of different varieties of marijuana and whether they eat or smoke it. Since the metabolic pathways are so different between eating and smoking, the effects of the same variety may also vary. Medical users may find that a variety which didn't help control their symptoms when smoked may do so when eaten. It should be noted that the different varieties of marijuana will also have profoundly different effects due to variations in the percent of THC, as well as other cannabinoids and their relative ratios. The method of ingesting marijuana will, as noted, compound this variation in cannabinoids due to the difference in metabolic pathways, and their related by-products. The user must carefully find out what works for them.
People with underlying liver disease should be very careful with marijuana dosage, as which all medications, because the diseased liver may not be able to metabolize drugs efficiently. This can result in slower elimination of the drug, unknown drug-drug interactions and higher than normal biochemical activity. When eating (or smoking) marijuana it is also a good idea to drink plenty of water. This increases blood volume and aids metabolism-the processing and elimination of substances in the body. It may also slow the excessive sedation, which often occurs with eating marijuana.
The effects of marijuana, based upon the nature of the drug and the method of ingesting it, combine with more situational influences. These influences were described by Dr. Andrew Weil, in his testimony before Judge Francis Young in Drug Enforcement Administration marijuana rescheduling hearings conducted in the late 80's, "The amount of drug consumed will, to some degree, determine the intensity of the experience. But, the nature of the experience will largely be mediated by set and setting." Set is the mental disposition of the user, while setting is the environment and surroundings the drug is used in. Thus, all users should pay attention to the environment and their mental state to choose the right time and place. Natural outdoor situations are more conducive settings than work or school.
Marijuana, like any drug, has definite side effects and contraindications (conditions for which it is not medically appropriate). Persons eating marijuana should use very small amounts of any unknown variety until they can closely regulate the dosage-and subsequent effect. This "titration" process is easier with smoking. Side-effects with eating marijuana may be more pronounced, especially in naive users. There are no truly life-threatening side effects documented and, incredibly, there is no lethal overdose in 5,000 years of documented use. Common side-effects include dizziness, sweating, rapid heart-rate, dry mouth, perceptual changes, excessive sedation and occasionally, especially in inexperienced users, panic symptoms. These can often be minimized by attention to very small doses until tolerance to the drug develops.
Tolerance is a biochemical process in which body systems begin to recognize and adapt to the effects of a substance. In the case of marijuana, the heart rate increases, and then rapidly decreases as tolerance develops. Tolerance to some of the effects of marijuana, like heart rate, forms quickly-within 1 or 2 days. Unlike opiates, however, tolerance to dosage doesn't seem to occur. Many people use the same dosage for many years. With careful titration an effective dose can easily be achieved. It is wise to use the smallest effective dose for any drug and marijuana is no exception.
But, even with the same variety, eating will require a larger dosage. Research has identified several clear medical indications for marijuana, that is, conditions where marijuana is medically appropriate and useful. These include antiemetic (antinausea) effects for people undergoing cancer chemotherapy, reduction of ocular (eyeball) pressure of those with glaucoma, appetite stimulant properties for people suffering from AIDS wasting syndrome, antispasmodic properties for those with diseases like multiple sclerosis and as a treatment for chronic pain-especially migraine headaches. Other promising applications are as an antianxiety agent and antidepressant. Probably the best researched application at this time is as an analgesic (see Marijuana: A Promising Pain Killer). In short, marijuana is as close to a wonder drug as exists today. No wonder its use dates back to antiquity.
But, naturally, marijuana has limitations as well as benefits. Marijuana is contraindicated in several groups of people. Those who suffer from Paranoid Schizophrenia may see symptoms increase because of the perceptual changes brought on by its intoxicating qualities. Smoking marijuana (or anything!) is also not indicated for those with chronic pulmonary diseases like bronchitis, emphysema, or pneumonia. The oral route may offer an option for these people. Those suffering from heart disease should only use marijuana with the advice of a doctor because the rapid heart rate it induces may
compromise blood flow to the heart (angina). Persons with underlying substance abuse issues should approach cannabis use carefully and consult with their doctor.
Cannabis Dependance Syndrome is a recognized psychiatric disturbance characterized by inability to control use and use despite negative consequences. It occurs in a small percentage of chronic heavy marijuana users and usually resolves with cessation of use. Anyone who thinks that marijuana may be the right medicine for them should talk with their medical doctor about its use, and effects. All medical Doctors are required by law to maintain confidentiality in patient communications. If your doctor refuses to seriously consider your point of view and honestly discuss it with you, consider finding a new doctor. A form is provided on this website for medical marijuana users to help them document their condition. Just click the "FORMS" button at the end of this article.
Smoking Marijuana
Marijuana is most often smoked. For some indications, particularly nausea and vomiting related to anticancer treatment, this route is far superior to the oral route. It is also faster. The lungs absorb aerosolized THC within seconds of smoking, rapidly passing it into pulmonary circulation. From the heart it travels to the brain within 1 to 10 minutes. As with eating, the dosage absorbed varies widely because of variable THC concentrations. Careful self-titration will quickly show the correct dosage. Smoking marijuana increases bioavailability over eating because THC bypasses the liver and GI tract . Less 11-hydroxy-THC is formed as well.
It is important to realize that no amount of smoking can be considered "good." Smoking, by its very nature is unhealthy. The process of combustion releases many chemicals into pulmonary circulation including carbon compounds, and particulates. Some research has shown that marijuana contains higher levels of combustion gasses than tobacco. Surprisingly, marijuana use has not been associated with higher rates of lung cancer. This is probably due to the relatively small quantity of marijuana smoked in comparison to tobacco. Nonetheless the goals of harm reduction, regarding this method of consuming marijuana, aim at minimizing the ingestion of harmful gasses while maximizing the dosage of THC.
Smoking behaviors also affect the delivered dose. Some users inhale deeply and hold their breath. Though this may increase the amount of THC absorbed, it also vastly increases the concentrations of combustion by-products (Carbon Monoxide and Tars). THC is absorbed quickly. Smokers can reduce the amount of toxic gasses absorbed by smoking small puffs and holding breath for 1-2 seconds.
Smokers should, whenever possible, avoid using butane lighters on pipes. These lighters create toxic by-products which get sucked into the lungs. Matches are probably superior. Water pipes remove the harsh qualities from the smoke by humidifying it. Unfortunately, research has not shown that waterpipes remove tars from smoke. Joints offer an easy method to smoke marijuana though they also combust. The amount of THC in a joint increases as it burns. Therefore, taking successively smaller puffs delivers the same amount of THC.
Smoking is an irritant to throat and lung tissue which causes mucus formation. During and after smoking, drinking a glass or two of water will soothe the throat and help liquefy particulate laden secretions. Expectorating (coughing the secretions) will rid the body of some of the trapped particulates. There is no credible scientific evidence that cannabinoids themselves cause physical disease, however, since marijuana smoke contains many of the same chemical compounds as tobacco smoke there could well be a link to malignant lung changes (cancer). It is surprising that this link has not been made considering the widespread use of marijuana world wide.
In support of harm reduction one relatively new technology seems to offer great promise for smoking as a method to deliver marijuana. It is the vaporizer. These devices have a wide range of uses. They can be used as aromatherapy diffusers or safe smoking pipes. Vaporizers may play an important role for those patients who need to use the smoking route to ingest marijuana. Marijuana is simply heated to a temperature which aerosolizes the THC without burning it- about 170°C. The THC is then taken into the lungs. A small amount of research has been done to compare the different smoking devices. The Marijuana Water Pipe and Vaporizer Study, sponsored by California National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML) and the Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies (MAPS) concluded that vaporizers performed most efficiently of joints, pipes and bongs.
However there were confusing factors including the greater formation of Cannabidiol (CBN) with vaporizers. CBN is a chemical by-product formed when THC is exposed to oxygen. Old, unharvested buds form higher levels of CBN and, indeed, some growers report that old buds impart a more sedentary and sleepy high. Recent research has shown promising pharmaceutical possibilities with CBN which has few psychoactive effects.
Some patients, particularly those with MS or epilepsy, may find that CBN benefits them more than THC. Again, more research needs to be done. The study also indicated that the higher levels of CBN resulted in lower levels of THC. In spite of this, vaporizers outperformed all other devices in reducing the amount of harmful by-products released into the lungs relative to the THC. Vaporizers, although they offer room for future improvement, are probably the safest way to deliver therapeutic doses of cannabinoids to the lungs, an essential goal for harm reduction in relation to inhaling marijuana.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
marijuana cannabis pot mary jane medical medicinal AIDS aids HIV hiv pain MS spasm marijuana cannabis sex chat xxx sexual dysfunctions seeds pot seeds XXX growing garden hydroponic Holland Amsterdam drug war drug information drugs epilepsy warts wasting syndrome cachexia playboy pain muscle netscape software nude porno games porn weather penthouse pornography pussy persian kitty maps marijuana cannabis music adult chat rooms erotica microsoft jokes shareware magazines pictures employment jobs marijuana cannabis erotic gay netscape bondage lingerie hardcore hustler espn supermodels disney star wars girls Marijuana Cannabis movies star trek mirc genealogy screen savers japan soccer tits nude celebrities nudity mpeg nudes mtv las vegas nasa travel metallica real estate stock quotes golf sex stories lesbian cnn sports quake hewlett packard irc simpsons gay sex nirvana x-files madonna sex pictures horoscope football map java midi anal sex cars usa today recipes education mexico airlines html free sex days of our lives australia nfl india babes wrestling history